ADVERTISEMENT

UNC Smacked by Own Professor

PACKed House

Hokie Hall of Fame
Oct 17, 2001
11,110
64
48
This is gonna have the Tarholes all in an uproar!

"But a key detail about UNC's experience with academic fraud has gone largely unnoticed -- thanks to the university's assiduous PR management and a strangely desultory NCAA investigation. The system of academic fraud cooked up around 1990 was initially intended to benefit one team in particular: the men's basketball team.

The first UNC course offered as a favor to the basketball team, scheduled in 1988, was an independent study for two painfully weak students who hovered at or below the eligibility line. They received helpful B's, and out of that little experiment the UNC course scam was born. In fall 1992 one star of the basketball team ostensibly pursued an independent study with a faculty member who was on sabbatical at the time. (I know this because I shared a fellowship leave with that faculty member.) This had to have been one of the "shadow" courses offered by the administrative assistant who played such a central role in the fraud, a generous woman whose closest friend was the basketball team's academic counselor. She assigned A or B grades in the shadow courses, which required no attendance and little work. One player on the 1993 team took seven suspect courses with her help; four starters on that team majored in the department where she worked. UNC's 1993 championship run seems to have been aided and abetted by fraud."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-m-smith/college-basketball-an-unhealthy-addiction_b_9463152.html
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jackcrow
"thanks to the university's assiduous PR management and a strangely desultory NCAA investigation......."

Finally some who communicates like me!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: vtpmt81
Heat has been applied and the NCAA will have to do their job. If not, they might as well close shop.
 
This situation is almost laughable. There is not one bone in my body that doesn't believe that the NCAA has worked (maybe too closely) to ensure that nothing would be done until after the NCAA playoffs are done and the money is all in. Then and only then will they do anything and I still don't expect them to be just in any decision they make. Let's face it, the only reason they are still considering this is because they were exposed into doing it. They have operated like a fox in the henhouse. If they were honest they would have done the job right in the first place and issued punishment several years ago. The NCAA is a big fat joke.
 
This situation is almost laughable. There is not one bone in my body that doesn't believe that the NCAA has worked (maybe too closely) to ensure that nothing would be done until after the NCAA playoffs are done and the money is all in. Then and only then will they do anything and I still don't expect them to be just in any decision they make. Let's face it, the only reason they are still considering this is because they were exposed into doing it. They have operated like a fox in the henhouse. If they were honest they would have done the job right in the first place and issued punishment several years ago. The NCAA is a big fat joke.

I nominate this man for president.
 
I believe ACC Commish Swofford is in cahoots with NCAA. He is a UNC man, and NCAA doesn't want to punish Tar Heels. NCAA probably likes Swofford bring in all the "northern" schools to ACC. Even better, they probably like him moving ACC basketball tournament up north. I will be glad when Swofford is gone and hopefully ACC will get a commissioner that will stand up for the conference.
 
Do we really want UNC to forfeit tournament basketball games in the last five years? When each win is worth a million or more to the conference in units.
 
Do we really want UNC to forfeit tournament basketball games in the last five years? When each win is worth a million or more to the conference in units.

The other ACC schools would not have to forfeit any money...so yes...any and all games that they had ineligible players in need to be forfeited. You don't reward cheaters.
 
The other ACC schools would not have to forfeit any money...so yes...any and all games that they had ineligible players in need to be forfeited. You don't reward cheaters.
I guess there is some benefit in this but everyone they beat with the ineligible players still believe they got beat in the games they played against them. Monetary punishment is diferent if it is done right. No pussyfooting.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT