Will talking football huh glad we have BB to stay in the present
- Thread starter TECHHOO?
- Start date
Slow down HR....take your meds.....your post are all over the place today, even weird for you. I guess if VT had won the ACC in football this year you would agree they weren't really the Champion since they didn't play FSU or Clemson.......you would be poking your chest out as far as your belly if VT had won, balanced schedule or not. Now take those meds and lay down.....
Ole Miss was a solid team - beat Boise State, Memphis, Alabama, and Mississippi State. The Ole Miss - Auburn game could have went either way. Ole Miss smoked Texas A&M at Kyle Field. Ole Miss was hardly an also-ran. I know they got smoked by Arkansas - but Arky was an above average team lost some heartbreakers early in the year vs. A&M and Alabama.
However, Ole Miss could have played a mistake free game and they still would have lost to TCU - TCU is just better and a team that deserved to play for the national title. However, there were only 4 spots.
A lot of folks are picking one game a team won or lost, and making a case one way or the other. But no one is taking the Ohio State loss to VT and making a case.
In reality, every game that Alabama, TCU, Baylor and Oregon lost, was to a better team than VT.
The Committee should have taken OSU's loss to VT and thrown the Buckeyes out of the Committee Hotel Room on Day 1 of their get together.
In reality, every game that Alabama, TCU, Baylor and Oregon lost, was to a better team than VT.
The Committee should have taken OSU's loss to VT and thrown the Buckeyes out of the Committee Hotel Room on Day 1 of their get together.
Do you really think a TCU team that did not win its conference deserved to be in the playoff?
As for Ole Miss, they were far from a solid team. Sounds like you have been drinking too much SEC Kool Aid like HR. In addition to losing to Auburn and LSU, both of which turned out to be nothing great, they lost 30-0 to a 7-6 (2-6 in the SEC) Ark. team that was far from "above average", and they lost 42-3 to TCU. "Solid" teams don't lose 2 games by 30 or more points.
Back to OSU, I find it funny that HR still wants to say OSU did not belong, but Bama definitely did, ignoring what happened when they played on the field. Not only that, but the committee gave Bama a #1 seed and a cozy spot in the Sugar Bowl, but OSU still whipped them. Then, they followed that up by drilling an Oregon team that had just drilled FSU. Only HR would say that proves nothing.
HR, you really have a hard time admitting teams you hate are good, don't you? You just cannot give OSU football and UVA hoops credit, no matter what they accomplish. It is entertaining to most of us, so we thank you for that.
I will NEVER give Ohio State credit. No one can ever convince me they belonged. Not Frank Beamer, Nick Saban, nor anyone on this board.
As for UVA basketball, the jury is still out.
This post was edited on 1/27 4:48 PM by Hampton Roads 6
As for UVA basketball, the jury is still out.
This post was edited on 1/27 4:48 PM by Hampton Roads 6
The hoosiers were starting to turn on Creane after the third season despite inheriting a team with 2 walkons and 3 yrs probation when he arrived. Luckily he had a breakout season the next year that saved his job. Bennett wanted no part of the mess Kelvin Sampson left and the microwave Hoosier fans. Expectations at Indiana are 10xs what they are at UVA.
And dont think UVA is a basketball dream job. Let one of the big boys in good standing come calling and youll see Bennett gone in a split second. No matter what he wins at UVA...the ACC is Duke, UNC and even UofL first and probably always will be.
Similar threads
