ADVERTISEMENT

Through about a quarter of the game for film review...

First thing that comes to mind is poor playcalling on first and second down from the Hokies, preventing the offense from getting any sort of rhythm (and making it easier for Syracuse to defend long third downs).

I hate to be "complain about playcalling" guy, because you never know what the coaches' overall plan was, or what they saw on film. But VT was just lighting drive on fire and throwing them away by choosing not to put the team in positions to succeed once it was clear Syracuse was selling out against the run.

Adam Friedman's midseason take on ACC recruiting classes...

Where is VT you might ask? Well.....

Current ACC Recruiting Rank: 8

The Hokies were 4-1 and ranked No. 17 in the AP Top 25 heading into last weekend and laid an egg at Syracuse. Even before the unexpected loss, Virginia Tech was underperforming on the recruiting trail. Tahj Capehart is the only four-star commitment right now and Rivals250 defensive end TyJuan Garbutt decommitted during the offseason. Many believe Garbutt is destined to rejoin this recruiting class and Rivals100 defensive back Devon Hunter is essentially the Hokies' to lose. This class has potential, but right now it’s just average.

We had better finish strong or there are going to be people lined up with pitchforks and torches at the end of the season.

**New** The Final Word: Syracuse

Starting with the offense (the defense will appear on the front page shortly), looking at what went wrong in the Carrier Dome:

Overall offense

The Hokies seemed to outthink themselves with the gameplan in the first half, and by the second half, they were playing catch-up (even after they tied the game) making things tough for personnel to execute.

They didn’t adjust to Syracuse loading the box and blitzing run, instead being content to dive into eight-and nine-man fronts, and jet sweeps against an undersized-but-athletic Syracuse defense wasn’t a good adjustment. Bubble screens often draw the ire of college football fans, but the coaches opted not to throw them to trips receivers with only two defenders over them, which could have not only gone for big yardage, but also slowed down Syracuse’s tendency to send the house.

Sweeps against defensive sets with two men on the line of scrimmage outside the tackle are tough to execute, even with pulling guards, and Virginia Tech didn’t do anything to back off the defense and change that.

Once the coaches did adjust, the team started running out of gas (though that was a bigger issue on defense), and then they went extreme catch-up mode to early, with more than seven minutes left and just a one-score deficit, going for deep passes after the defense had just been ground down.

On the early fourth down failure, the coaches had timeouts remaining, but didn't salvage a play that seemed doomed to fail, when the players were racing the play clock just to get the snap off. That would have been a good chance to calm the team down, set the tone, and pick up the conversion, possibly changing the outcome of the game.

QB

Jerod Evans didn’t have his best day, though until late, he was probably good enough to win the game. He was lucky on his first long pass, to fullback Steven Peoples, because it looks like the pass was intended for Cam Phillips (who didn’t think it was coming).

Evans’ short accuracy was iffy at times, and VT really needed him to execute. He short-hopped a couple throws in zone windows with his team running all-curls – a quick-hitter to slow down the pass rush and make the defense play coverage a bit – and his receivers didn’t always do a great job helping him out. To be fair to them, they did an outstanding job saving him on plays where he had no business completing a pass.

We also saw something that we’re used to by now: slightly overthrowing receivers deep. He outpaced Peoples on one well-designed screen fake, and overshot Isaiah Ford on a couple occasions (though one of those may have been on the receiver). The longer a throw is, the tougher it is to be accurate, obviously, and he’s generally not putting those in the areas where a defender can get them. On a better day, a couple of them hit, and we’re feeling very different this week.

Where Evans was pretty good, though not as good as Dungey, was scrambling. With his skillset, he’s comfortable tucking and running when the opportunity presents itself. He’s capable of making guys miss in the open field (as he did a couple times). He also made some mistakes in that phase of the game though, physically or mentally. He got spooked when trying to break contain and finding a defender there, which led to his interception and a couple instances where he ran out of bounds for a short loss – whereas we saw Dungey pull a play out of his hat, or at least get rid of the ball for no lost yardage.

Prior to the Hokies’ first failed fourth down, he had a big hole (like a 38-yard touchdown, potentially) on third down, but slipped trying to cut to the hole. You’d rather he see that running lane, sure, but he has to be able to hit it, as well. On the fourth down play, Evans audibled to s speed option to the short side of the field against a nine-man box, and both he and his running back started moving before the snap (which barely beat the play clock). With timeouts in his pocket, that probably would have been a good time for Fuente to use one to settle the team.

Late in the game, when Syracuse backed off defensively a bit instead of playing the run, Evans got a little antsy in terms of trying to force plays or feeling pressure that wasn’t there. When the team went down by a score in the fourth (after the comeback), he perhaps tried to do a bit too much – though part of that could have been the plays called.

Thoughts

Obviously super frustrating n pathetic performance.
1- fuente has them over achieving - destroying prior 3 opponents.
2- we had chances to win but didn't (Clemson shoulda lost, it sucks but it's natural for 18-23 to over look teams)
3- its a big work in progress to have kids buy in 100% of time esp in year one is very tough.
4- its apparent we are a few players away ( ZEROOOO pass rush yesterday- Aka our good DE are super young, Vinne is workaholic but isn't very athletic, Ken has solid technique but isn't explosive.
Gallo and Conte are average, hard workers but extremely athleticed limited.
Point is recruiting takes time to fix prior mistakes.)
5- we start second half with Travon and we go right down and score. Then we take him out n stop running with him- puzzling and perplexing.
6- I expect a very energetic bunch Thursday but if Miami has success running it could be a tough tough game. Moto and our under sized DT's (other then settle) aren't suited to play smash mouth.
LETS GO HOKIES!

Step Back From The Ledge

1) Were we really one of the four best teams in the country? NO. We had zero shot of the playoff, regardless of what ESPN says. So at end of the day this loss doesn't necessarily hurt us. We STILL control our own destiny. That said..

2) Our road has gotten harder, as we cant afford to trip up. BUT, maybe a loss is what we needed. I HATED Evan's comments last week, I think it was poor leadership that led to poor focus, as a whole. This is a classic example to learn and see just how mature our leaders are. Remember, we are still YOUNG, and most of this team will be back next year. This was going to happen sooner or later. I'd rather it happen NOW opposed to November or to UVA. We got beat in every aspect of game and that can be attributed to everyone coaches included. It's time to see how we respond.

3) We MAY lose Thursday, but I don't think it will be because of lack of focus. Miami is a good team. I am interested to see Fuente vs. Richt. We need to support our team Thursday.

4) Bud Foster has to change something. It seems like once a year he simply gets outschemed. This year it was Syracuse. Last year it was UNC. Year before it was ECU. We arent getting out talented, we are simply failing to make adjustments. All day Saturday they had mismatches and we failed to adjust and take away the underneath stuff. We weren't prepared for Dungy's mobility, and that is a problem.

5) We can still win the Coastal and still BUILD on this loss. We have the chance now to accomplish our goals and finish the year GOOD, but importantly do so in a quiet manner. This team clearly did not handle success well - - which is to somewhat be expected when you are young and haven't experienced it before. We are still a tallented football team, and now have the chance to fly back under the radar. We do this with the same focus we had for the last month, come late November we will be in a great spot.

6) We will really learn about this team Thursday. I think we will be fine. I think we have a fine group of leaders and tallented players. If we build off this like I think we will, and Fuente responds and proves to be the kind of leader I think he is, than this loss may end up being a blessing long term.

**New** My game column

With a couple interesting quotes from Fuente and Foster.

https://virginiatech.rivals.com/news/hokies-down-but-not-out-after-upset-loss

My personal take is that it's just one of those games that happen in college football (unless you're Alabama, or on the other end, Purdue or something). It stinks, no two ways about it, but as long as it's not indicative of a trend - and thus far, there's really nothing (other than untimely turnovers) that seems to be a persistent issue - you move on and worry about the rest of the games.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT