ADVERTISEMENT

Hokies up to No. 13 in both national polls

Slowly but surely climbing.

https://virginiatech.rivals.com/news/hokies-rise-to-no-13-in-both-polls

A few teams ahead of the Hokies have some reasonable competition - if at least a couple of Florida State (NC State), USC (surprisingly undefeated Cal), Oklahoma State (No. 14 TCU), Georgia (No. 17 Mississippi State) or Washington (Colorado) lose, the Clemson game could be a top-ten matchup.

In case you were looking for signs ESPN's QBR is a terrible metric...

tt1qwcjhjaqpwlg4aawl


There's not a way on this planet those statlines are remotely comparable (especially since ESPN touts making plays when the game is in reach - i.e. not 50-17 like it was when Bush entered the game).

I've seen people point to QBR lately and say "this is stupid, it means advanced stats don't mean anything." That's the wrong take; the correct one is that ESPN is stupid, which has been apparent for a couple decades.

Wordking on defense film review

Mixing up the order each week to keep it fresh. I hadn't realized (I think I was too busy with my head in the computer posting here when the flag came out live - which was like 10 seconds after the play - and then ran to the bathroom during the review or something) that the targeting call on Stroman in the first quarter was so bad.

I complain about really bad targeting calls every week, but that was so bad the official should be reprimanded, no questions asked. The rule is written such that 1) intent matters, and 2) helmet-to-helmet contact is a key (though not a strict requirement) to making the call. A receiver dove onto Stroman's back - landed on his butt, even, like 3 feet away from Stroman's helmet! - and Stroman was called for targeting. It meets literally zero of the requirements for the call.

He was called for a penalty that would have seen him ejected from the contest because a player jumped on top of him as he was trying to make an interception.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT